Brookline's Surveillance Project
Brookline could get a set of a dozen cameras to watch roadways in the event of a crisis but residents are raising serious questions about their effectiveness and surveillance by police when no crisis exists.
Abram Chipman, a Washington Street resident who holds a weekly vigil in Coolidge Corner protesting the war in Iraq, said he would feel less comfortable knowing police could be watching his activities. Joan Lancourt, a resident of Beaconsfield Road, said she worried the cameras would have a “chilling effect” on political protest in Brookline.
“I was dismayed, because the potential for self-censorship is real,” she said.
Critics have also questioned the usefulness of the cameras, citing a variety of studies showing that the presence of police cameras has little effect on crime rates. Several residents noted that London’s crime rate has climbed, despite an enormous number of surveillance cameras.
[Police Chief] O’Leary has acknowledged that the camera’s usefulness in reducing
crime rates is still unproven. But supporters have stated repeatedly
that the primary purpose of the cameras is not to prevent crime, but to
help public safety officials coordinate an evacuation from Boston in
the event of a terrorist attack or natural disaster.
Maybe they could just leave the cameras off until there is a crisis. (Image: Subcircle/Flickr)















